Do you believe in karma?
The idea of karma has always sat uneasily with me. On the surface it feels simple, almost tidy. Be decent. Do not be cruel for sport. Do not treat people like they are disposable. The universe will eventually even the score. If you are rude, selfish, or vicious, something will come back around and collect the debt. That version of karma is easy to repeat because it sounds moral and useful. It also flatters us a little. It suggests the world is keeping score, that character is not wasted, that meanness is not free.
Then the obvious objection arrives and the whole neat story starts to buckle. What about children? What about babies who die of disease before they have had a chance to form a lasting thought, let alone a pattern of action? If karma is personal payback aimed at the child, the idea becomes grotesque. A three-month-old does not have a ledger of cruelty. A toddler with leukemia is not being taught a lesson about last year’s gossip. I do not believe the sick child is the one being sentenced. That picture is too small and too cruel. It turns a baby into a moral invoice.
What I do believe is harder, and I know how it sounds. I think the test is aimed at the parents. I think the punishment, if that is the word, is meant for them. Not because every grieving mother or father is secretly a monster. I am not saying that. I am saying the blow does not land on the child as a completed person with a history of choices. The child is the point of impact. The parents are the ones left standing in the blast. They are the ones who have to keep living inside a world that just proved it can take the one thing they would have died to protect. That is a test of a different order. It does not ask what a baby deserved. It asks what the adults become when the worst thing they can imagine stops being imaginary.
I hold that view loosely because I cannot prove it, and because it is ugly enough that I would rather be wrong. But the popular story — that disease is the child’s karma — has never made sense to me. The child’s body is too new to be the courtroom. The parents’ lives are where the sentence continues. Sleep, marriage, faith, work, the sound of a quiet house, the question of whether they still believe anything is watching. That is where the weight stays.
The same cheap version of karma gets applied to ego. A lot of people talk as if walking around with an inflated sense of yourself is a spiritual crime, something the universe will eventually tax. Be humble. Shrink. Remember you are nothing special. I have heard that sermon my whole life, and I do not buy it. I personally believe ego is good. Not the kind that needs to crush other people to feel tall, but the kind that looks in the mirror and decides, without apology, that you are the greatest. That belief has helped me more than being “humbled” ever did. Being told I was a piece of shit never made me kinder, stronger, or more useful. It just made me smaller. Believing I was exceptional gave me a reason to act like the work mattered.
I think the universe tests us. Not always individually, and not always fairly in the way a courtroom is fair. Sometimes the test is private: loss, illness, humiliation, a long season of being unseen. Sometimes it is public and collective. A flood, an earthquake, a plague, a famine. Those events do not look to me like the universe picking out the guilty children and smashing them. They look like pressure applied to the people who have to answer for what happens next. Pressure builds diamonds. Who runs toward the wreckage. Who hoards. Who lies. Who builds again. Who uses the disaster as an excuse to become smaller. In the case of a sick child, the wreckage is a crib, a hospital hallway, a diagnosis. The test is not the infant’s character. The test is whether the parents collapse into bitterness, vanish into numbness, turn on each other, or somehow remain capable of love in a world that just showed them it does not negotiate.
That is not the same as saying the suffering is good. It is not. The point is not that a dying child is a gift wrapped in pain. The point is that the event exposes the real architecture of the people left behind. Comfort hides it. This kind of grief does not.
There is an old line that keeps coming back to me: the toughest soldiers always have the heaviest cross to bear. It mixes two languages, military and religious, but the meaning is plain enough. Capacity and burden often travel together. The person who can carry more is often given more to carry. Not because the universe is sadistic for sport, but because weight reveals strength that lighter loads never would. I will not pretend that makes a child’s death just. It does not turn a nursery into a proving ground for the baby. If there is a soldier in that picture, it is the parent. The heaviest cross is not laid on the one who never got to live long enough to understand the metaphor. It is laid on the ones who have to carry the body of the story afterward.
Ego belongs in that picture too. A crushed self does not carry a heavy cross well. A person who has been trained to think they are worthless will fold under pressure and call the folding humility. I would rather go into the test believing I am built for it. That does not mean I think the universe owes me a soft life. It means I refuse to enter difficulty already defeated. If I ever had to stand where those parents stand, I would rather meet it as someone who still believes he is capable of greatness than as someone who spent years practicing self-erasure and then called that wisdom.
Maybe that is why karma never quite settled in my mind in its popular form. The slogan wants a clean moral physics. Do wrong, get hit. Do right, get shielded. Get proud, get slapped down. The child gets sick because the child earned it. Life does not behave that way. Good people drown. Vicious people die rich and admired. Infants get sick. Whole towns vanish in weather. And sometimes the blow that looks aimed at the smallest person in the room is actually aimed at the adults who have to outlive it.
If there is any pattern at all, it seems slower, wider, and less personal than the slogan — except in this one terrible sense, which feels personal to the bone. The child is not being punished for thoughts they never had. The parents are the ones inside the trial. The universe, if it is doing anything, is not grading a baby. It is asking what kind of people remain when the thing they loved most is placed on the altar and not given back.
I still think we should be better. Not because a cosmic clerk is watching the receipt printer, but because cruelty adds weight to a world that already has more than enough. Kindness does not guarantee safety. It does not buy immunity for your children. An honest ego does not guarantee safety either. Nothing does. What remains is the manner of the response. And if the universe is testing anyone in the death of a sick child, I do not think it is the child. I think it is the parents — and, after them, everyone who watches and decides whether to look away, explain it too quickly, or admit that some tests are not meant to make us humble. They are meant to show us whether we can still stand.
Leave a comment