Tag: Movies

  • A League of Their Own: Reimagining Feminism

    A League of Their Own: Reimagining Feminism

    In a world drowning in performative activism and corporate girlboss-ness, I find myself returning to one movie that actually gets feminism right: Penny Marshall’s 1992 classic A League of Their Own.

    The film does not lecture you. It does not scream about the patriarchy or demand that you affirm anyone’s feelings. Instead, it shows women rolling up their sleeves, stepping onto the baseball diamond, and proving they belong—not because someone owed them a spot, but because they earned it through talent, grit, and sheer stubbornness.

    Real Empowerment, No Victimhood Required

    Set during World War II, A League of Their Own tells the story of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League. With the men off fighting, these women were not waiting for permission or special treatment. They tried out, competed fiercely, and played real baseball in front of skeptical crowds. The movie nails the tension between traditional expectations (“be ladylike!”) and the raw reality of sliding into bases, spitting tobacco, and throwing like you mean it.

    The women face ridicule, ridiculous uniforms, and mandatory charm school, yet they respond by getting better at the game. That is the kind of feminism worth celebrating: one that expands opportunity through excellence rather than lowering standards or rewriting rules.

    Tom Hanks delivers one of his most quotable performances as Jimmy Dugan, the washed-up, foul-mouthed and drunken manager who starts off dismissive of his new team. He dives into his arsenal of acting skills and proves to one of the greatest/ all encompassing talents to watch. His arc from cynical has-been to proud coach is pure gold, and his legendary “There’s no crying in baseball!” rant remains one of the funniest moments. Hanks does not mansplain or apologize for his initial attitude—he grows because the women force him to see their competence. It is organic character development, not a scripted takedown of toxic masculinity (because clearly there is no such thing!).

    The supporting cast is stacked in the most 90s way possible. Madonna as “All the Way” Mae brings swagger and showmanship, and Rosie O’Donnell as Doris provides heart and humor. Watching them now is oddly nostalgic—they were vibrant, funny, and unapologetic without being cringe with the heavy ideological baggage they now adopt. It is a reminder of a time when pop culture could just be fun instead of a constant sermon.

    The whole ensemble feels like a genuine team. These characters have flaws, rivalries, and personal stakes, but they are never reduced to their gender or used as props for a message. The feminism emerges naturally from the story: women being capable, competitive, and resilient when given the chance. Not women who think that they are superior to men.

    A League of Their Own celebrates women’s strength without tearing down men or pretending biology does not matter on the field (obviously women sports are not as competitive/ popular as men’s and that is OK). It shows sisterhood that includes healthy competition. It acknowledges hardship, (as the whole reasoning behind this team is the separation from loved ones during war) without wallowing in it. It is, thus, extremely patriotic—Most importantly, the women win respect by playing well, not by demanding it (*cough, cough * Women’s USA Soccer Team).

    In contrast to today’s discourse, which often frames women as perpetual victims needing protection from “the system,” this movie says: Here is an opportunity—go seize it. And they did. The real AAGPBL players inspired the film, and their legacy still feels refreshing thirty-plus years later.

    If more modern feminism looked like the Rockford Peaches—tough, talented, and focused on achievement rather than outrage—I suspect a lot more people would get on board.

  • How Pretty Woman Shaped My Understanding of Love

    How Pretty Woman Shaped My Understanding of Love

    I want to elaborate on this post. Pretty Woman was one of the first movies that I watched in America. I was four years old. I did not speak any English. But I understood it completely. 


    To me, it is not a story about a sex worker. This contrasts with the Oscar movie Anora, which I was told was a modern version of Pretty Woman. It is a story of a woman who needs saving. So I spent my entire life aspiring to be a damsel in distress.

    At four years old, I was not sure what I would need to be saved from. I knew that Vivienne also saved Edward. So, I aspired that I would need to be a savior to my own man. 

    Ultimately, this is how I have arranged my own life. I am strong enough for him but I need him to save me from..myself? And everything that have been through. Women are not supposed to be “I do not need a man” strong—and while I do not blame anyone or anything that has happened to me— I simply should have reacted differently.

    Therefore, I need some saving. I need my man to save me from overreacting and overthinking everything that happens.


    I guess that is what I admire about this character and this story. Vivienne did not simply demand a check or cash to cure her status in life. She needed a man who actually cared enough about her and gave her guidance to achieve a better life. She also showed him that there is more to life than the money and status that he was chasing. She helped him overcome his fear of heights etc. overall, this movie is a beautiful fairytale for girls of all ages. 


    After viewing this fairytale throughout the years, I now know what is happening in the dialogue and the story. While Vivienne is definitely sharp and witty, she is a character who I am proud to have embodied as an influence