Tag: contrarian

  • Opting Out of the Script: Politics, Sports, and Forced Belonging

    Opting Out of the Script: Politics, Sports, and Forced Belonging

    It is Election Day, which means another round of the same ritualized theater I already know the ending to. Living in Washington state makes the whole thing feel especially pointless and grating. The politics here are not subtle. They are loud, self-congratulatory, and almost entirely one-directional. From Seattle outward, the dominant culture treats progressive orthodoxy as the only legitimate way to exist, and anyone who declines to perform the required enthusiasm is treated as a moral defective. Taxes stay high, housing stays expensive, crime in the major cities stays stubbornly higher than it should be, and the public conversation still revolves around the same narrow set of priorities—equity statements, climate timelines, and the constant ranking of people by identity categories. I do not find any of that interesting or persuasive. I find it tedious.

    Empty chair between opposing arrows on a stormy football field
    An empty chair between opposing arrows stands on a windswept football field beneath dark storm clouds.

    The sports side is only marginally better. Washington has teams, and people treat them with the same forced civic enthusiasm they apply to everything else. The Seahawks, the Mariners, the Huskies, the Sounders—pick your poison. Wins are celebrated as proof of regional virtue; losses are explained away with the same managerial language used for failed policy. I do not feel a tribal obligation to root for the local side just because the stadium is nearby. Watching people invest emotional capital in professional athletes and then act surprised when the results do not match their hopes is, to me, another form of the same groupthink. It is all noise.

    Abstract charts and checklists layered over a mountain landscape and winding river
    Abstract charts, checklists, and data forms merge with a sweeping mountain landscape to suggest planning and progress.

    I live as a consistent contrarian and, frankly, as a bah humbug about most of it. I do not sign on to the obligatory cheerfulness. I do not pretend that every cause, every team, every demographic narrative deserves my automatic respect or emotional investment. I despise a lot of things more or less equally: the political machine, the sports culture that mirrors it, the constant demand that I sort people into approved groups and then perform the correct attitude toward each group. That includes minorities as a category and disabled people as a category. I do not organize my life around those identities, I do not find them inherently sympathetic or interesting, and I do not think the social pressure to treat them as sacred is any more rational than the pressure to treat any other group that way. Some people with intellectual disabilities strike me as unsettling—the mannerisms, the unpredictability, the way the surrounding culture insists I must find it all endearing or else be labeled cruel. I do not. That does not mean I want anyone harmed; it means I decline the required emotional script.

    None of this is a political program or a call to action. It is just the private stance of someone who has decided most of the public enthusiasms on offer—political, athletic, demographic—are not worth joining. Election Day changes none of it. The ballots get counted, the same coalitions reassert themselves, the teams keep playing, and the expectation that I care remains. I do not.